<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hosting YUI Files for Implementations in Mainland China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/index.php/2008/01/15/hosting-yui-in-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2008/01/15/hosting-yui-in-china/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the YUI Project.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Miraglia</title>
		<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2008/01/15/hosting-yui-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-283527</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Miraglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yuiblog.com/blog/2008/01/15/hosting-yui-in-china/#comment-283527</guid>
		<description>@John -- At present, we&#039;re not planning to do this.  Because the address of the files is not user-facing in a significant way, and because the current approach does allow for some cross-site caching benefit based on the hosted files being in the same place, it strikes me that the benefit outweighs the disadvantages.  I can see how it would be nice to get the third-party domain out of one&#039;s code in some cases, but for those where this is really important the option exists to host the files oneself.  Regards, -Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John &#8212; At present, we&#8217;re not planning to do this.  Because the address of the files is not user-facing in a significant way, and because the current approach does allow for some cross-site caching benefit based on the hosted files being in the same place, it strikes me that the benefit outweighs the disadvantages.  I can see how it would be nice to get the third-party domain out of one&#8217;s code in some cases, but for those where this is really important the option exists to host the files oneself.  Regards, -Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2008/01/15/hosting-yui-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-282977</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yuiblog.com/blog/2008/01/15/hosting-yui-in-china/#comment-282977</guid>
		<description>Will you ever allow us to use a CNAME entry to the yahooapis.com domain? Similar to the way feedburner mybrand works. eg yui.mydomain.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you ever allow us to use a CNAME entry to the yahooapis.com domain? Similar to the way feedburner mybrand works. eg yui.mydomain.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

