<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Graded Browser Support Update: Q1 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/index.php/2010/02/16/gbs-update-2010q1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/02/16/gbs-update-2010q1/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the YUI Project.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Miraglia</title>
		<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/02/16/gbs-update-2010q1/comment-page-1/#comment-594928</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Miraglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 04:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/?p=1195#comment-594928</guid>
		<description>Apologies to everyone for the delay:

http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/articles/gbs/
http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/11/03/gbs-update-2010q4/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies to everyone for the delay:</p>
<p><a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/articles/gbs/" rel="nofollow">http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/articles/gbs/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/11/03/gbs-update-2010q4/" rel="nofollow">http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/11/03/gbs-update-2010q4/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graded Browser Support Update: Q4 2010 &#187; Yahoo! User Interface Blog (YUIBlog)</title>
		<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/02/16/gbs-update-2010q1/comment-page-1/#comment-594925</link>
		<dc:creator>Graded Browser Support Update: Q4 2010 &#187; Yahoo! User Interface Blog (YUIBlog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 04:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/?p=1195#comment-594925</guid>
		<description>[...] update implements the guidance we provided in Q1 2010. Of interest in this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] update implements the guidance we provided in Q1 2010. Of interest in this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soren</title>
		<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/02/16/gbs-update-2010q1/comment-page-1/#comment-594914</link>
		<dc:creator>Soren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/?p=1195#comment-594914</guid>
		<description>Any news on when we will see an update?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any news on when we will see an update?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/02/16/gbs-update-2010q1/comment-page-1/#comment-594745</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/?p=1195#comment-594745</guid>
		<description>http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-xp/

Chrome 9.0 trunk builds now available for testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-xp/" rel="nofollow">http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-xp/</a></p>
<p>Chrome 9.0 trunk builds now available for testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/02/16/gbs-update-2010q1/comment-page-1/#comment-594707</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/?p=1195#comment-594707</guid>
		<description>I think the C-grade list is correct; it&#039;s saying to withhold CSS/JavaScript from Safari 1 and 2, but not from 3. Version 3 is no longer A-grade but you shouldn&#039;t withhold the CSS and JavaScript from Safari 3 users as it is likely to still render as expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the C-grade list is correct; it&#8217;s saying to withhold CSS/JavaScript from Safari 1 and 2, but not from 3. Version 3 is no longer A-grade but you shouldn&#8217;t withhold the CSS and JavaScript from Safari 3 users as it is likely to still render as expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bm36</title>
		<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/02/16/gbs-update-2010q1/comment-page-1/#comment-594664</link>
		<dc:creator>bm36</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/?p=1195#comment-594664</guid>
		<description>A quibble about the C-grade list... 
The &#039;less than&#039; symbol (&lt;) was used to indicate versions previous to those on the A-grade list, as in &quot;Safari &lt; 3&quot;. Given that Safari 4 is the A-grade, the &#039;less than or equal to&#039; symbol (≤) would seem to me more appropriate, as this would logically include Safari 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quibble about the C-grade list&#8230;<br />
The &#8216;less than&#8217; symbol (&lt;) was used to indicate versions previous to those on the A-grade list, as in &quot;Safari &lt; 3&quot;. Given that Safari 4 is the A-grade, the &#039;less than or equal to&#039; symbol (≤) would seem to me more appropriate, as this would logically include Safari 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Miraglia</title>
		<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/02/16/gbs-update-2010q1/comment-page-1/#comment-594601</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Miraglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/?p=1195#comment-594601</guid>
		<description>@Tyler -- Fair criticism -- I apologize for the delay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tyler &#8212; Fair criticism &#8212; I apologize for the delay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Rasmussen</title>
		<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/02/16/gbs-update-2010q1/comment-page-1/#comment-594599</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Rasmussen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/?p=1195#comment-594599</guid>
		<description>What I don&#039;t understand (though I do, don&#039;t get me wrong, just hate it like everyone else)...why is IE 6.0 an A-grade browser?  Specifically, the definition of A-grade browser includes modern (with the word &quot;and&quot; which has clear meanings in a coder&#039;s mind), of which IE 6 (and arguably 7 and 8) is most definitely not.  IE6 should be downgraded to a new category of &quot;B-Grade&quot; : crappy browsers that are unfortunately very popular and constitute a statistically significant number of internet users.  I would love to make it C-Grade, but the definition of C-Grade, due to IE6 popularity, does not fit either.

@Eric Miraglia - &quot;2 weeks out&quot; becomes 3.5 weeks.  Will we ever see an update?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t understand (though I do, don&#8217;t get me wrong, just hate it like everyone else)&#8230;why is IE 6.0 an A-grade browser?  Specifically, the definition of A-grade browser includes modern (with the word &#8220;and&#8221; which has clear meanings in a coder&#8217;s mind), of which IE 6 (and arguably 7 and 8) is most definitely not.  IE6 should be downgraded to a new category of &#8220;B-Grade&#8221; : crappy browsers that are unfortunately very popular and constitute a statistically significant number of internet users.  I would love to make it C-Grade, but the definition of C-Grade, due to IE6 popularity, does not fit either.</p>
<p>@Eric Miraglia &#8211; &#8220;2 weeks out&#8221; becomes 3.5 weeks.  Will we ever see an update?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Owens</title>
		<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/02/16/gbs-update-2010q1/comment-page-1/#comment-594584</link>
		<dc:creator>David Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/?p=1195#comment-594584</guid>
		<description>The C-Grade list suggests we should think about hiding CSS and JavaScript from older versions of FF, Opera and Safari. Does anybody have suggestions on how to do that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The C-Grade list suggests we should think about hiding CSS and JavaScript from older versions of FF, Opera and Safari. Does anybody have suggestions on how to do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Miraglia</title>
		<link>http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2010/02/16/gbs-update-2010q1/comment-page-1/#comment-594295</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Miraglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/?p=1195#comment-594295</guid>
		<description>@Test -- Two things -- Yes, we&#039;ve been slow getting the current update out; my apologies for that.  And the rapid iteration of Chrome doesn&#039;t fit well with a quarterly update system.  We need to give better clarity about how the recommended testing surface should be modified when new Chrome versions are released.  We&#039;ll do that in the coming update, which is probably two weeks out. -Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Test &#8212; Two things &#8212; Yes, we&#8217;ve been slow getting the current update out; my apologies for that.  And the rapid iteration of Chrome doesn&#8217;t fit well with a quarterly update system.  We need to give better clarity about how the recommended testing surface should be modified when new Chrome versions are released.  We&#8217;ll do that in the coming update, which is probably two weeks out. -Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

